Built-in self-test method and apparatus for single-pin crystal oscillators

ABSTRACT

A built-in self-test (BIST) methodology and apparatus provide for testing and calibration of an integrated circuit oscillator circuit topology that uses a one-pin (a single-pin) external resonator. The method employs dedicated test circuitry, also referred to herein as BIST apparatus, for the pass/fail verification of both the active and passive building blocks of the oscillator. At the same time, the methodology ensures accurate calibration and matching of the capacitors using dedicated digital circuitry and algorithms.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to the following co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/980,995, entitled “BUILT-IN SELF-TEST METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SINGLE-PIN CRYSTAL OSCILLATORS,” filed on even date herewith, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

Modern clocking circuits in integrated circuits require stable frequency references (oscillators) with fast turn-on, small output noise, and small power consumption. Because of stringent frequency stability requirements, an external resonator with a high-quality factor (such as a quartz crystal) is usually employed in conjunction with active components in the integrated circuit for generating the reference oscillations. However, because the number of pins available in an integrated circuit for interfacing with other external circuits is limited, it is advantageous to use only one pin for connecting the resonator. Although only one pin is used for the resonator itself, high-performance oscillator architectures usually employ two capacitors that form part of a positive feedback path and a negative feedback path, respectively, such as in the case of the van den Homberg oscillator. The two capacitances associated with these two feedback paths must be precisely matched for good oscillator performance, which presents unique challenges with respect to testing and calibration. This testing and calibration must occur before the normal start-up of the oscillator.

If a capacitance on the reference/internal side of the oscillator, for example, is larger than the capacitance on the load/crystal/external side, then the oscillator is unstable, in the sense that an oscillation is possible at a frequency much different from the resonator frequency. Conversely, if the reference capacitance is correctly smaller than the load capacitance, which ensures operation at the desired resonant frequency, but the ratio of their values is not sufficiently close to 1, then the oscillator start-up time increases, which is also undesirable. Additional challenges are presented by the unavailability of proper stimuli and/or circuitry for their application in complex systems such as integrated receivers, transmitters, and transceivers, and by the low-supply-voltage environments in which active devices (such as transistors) must operate with small headroom voltages to stay within specification.

Therefore, there is currently a need in the art for properly calibrating the capacitances of an oscillator, such as a single-pin crystal oscillator, while also independently assessing the health of the oscillator's building blocks such as programmable oscillator capacitor blocks and active circuitry.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings provide visual representations which will be used to more fully describe various representative embodiments and can be used by those skilled in the art to better understand the representative embodiments disclosed and their inherent advantages. In these drawings, like reference numerals identify corresponding elements.

FIG. 1 is a diagram that illustrates an embodiment of a BIST architecture for a crystal oscillator circuit under test, in accordance with various representative embodiments.

FIG. 2 is a diagram that illustrates a first example configuration of a van den Homberg one-pin oscillator, such as may be used in the architecture of FIG. 1, in accordance with various representative embodiments.

FIG. 3 is a diagram of an alternative configuration of a van den Homberg one-pin oscillator, such as may be used in the architecture of FIG. 1, in accordance with various representative embodiments.

FIG. 4 is a diagram of an example implementation of a digitally-programmable oscillator capacitor, such as may be used in the circuits of FIGS. 2 and 3, in accordance with various representative embodiments.

FIG. 5 is a diagram of an example implementation of high-impedance (high-Z) mode for the oscillator of FIG. 3, in accordance with various representative embodiments.

FIG. 6 is a diagram that illustrates an example reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix, in accordance with various representative embodiments.

FIG. 7 illustrates a detailed implementation of the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix, in accordance with various representative embodiments.

FIG. 8 is a diagram that illustrates a CMOS-inverter crystal oscillator, in accordance with various representative embodiments.

FIG. 9 is a diagram that illustrates a detailed, example circuit configuration for the relaxation oscillator in FIG. 1, 6, or 7, in accordance with various representative embodiments.

FIG. 10 is a diagram that illustrates an example CMOS detailed circuit configuration for comparator COMP in FIG. 9, in accordance with various representative embodiments.

FIG. 11 shows example plots of voltage waveforms associated with the relaxation oscillator of FIG. 9, using a comparator COMP such as in FIG. 10, in accordance with various representative embodiments.

FIG. 12 shows an example waveform plot of the oscillation frequency of the relaxation oscillator in FIG. 9, in accordance with various representative embodiments.

FIG. 13 shows an example implementation of a binary search methodology for finding the capacitance code corresponding to frequency f_(ROref) in FIG. 12, in accordance with various representative embodiments.

FIG. 14 is a diagram that illustrates an example implementation of the reconfigurable DC test matrix and the DC test block in FIG. 1, 6, or 7, in accordance with various representative embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The disclosure relates to the field of testing and calibration of integrated circuits, and in particular to the testing and calibration of integrated circuit oscillators.

One way to ensure the correct operation of a crystal oscillator in a complex integrated communication system, or to troubleshoot a faulty oscillator unit, is to verify the correct operation of its individual components. In accordance with the various embodiments provided herein, this verification can be performed using dedicated test circuitry not normally associated with the main oscillator. The dedicated test circuitry is connected to the main oscillator at the time of the testing and disconnected during normal oscillator operation. This selective connection can be realized by digitally-controlled switches that can be grouped into more complex structures and therefore provide circuit reconfiguration, for selectively connecting the desired oscillator components (such as programmable oscillator capacitors, or components of the active core of the oscillator) to the test circuitry. The test circuitry itself can comprise circuit blocks that, when associated with portions of the oscillator under test, either generate or permit access to signals that are relevant to the testing process. The digital control for the required reconfiguration and testing functions can be integrated with the main digital section of the system. The embodiments described herein are clearly applicable to communication systems, as well as to any system or circuit that uses a frequency reference that is provided by a crystal oscillator.

A built-in self-test (BIST) methodology and apparatus provide for testing and calibration of an integrated circuit oscillator circuit topology that uses a one-pin (a single-pin) external resonator. The method employs dedicated test circuitry, also referred to herein as BIST apparatus, for the pass/fail verification of both the active building blocks of the oscillator (such as transconductors, operational transconductance amplifiers (OTA), and other types of oscillator amplifiers, all of which are made up of active components such as transistors) and the passive building blocks (such as digitally-programmable oscillator capacitor banks). At the same time, in the case of oscillators whose operation relies on matched oscillator capacitors, the method ensures accurate calibration and matching of the capacitors using dedicated digital circuitry and algorithms. Correct digital tuning of the oscillator in normal operation is achieved by properly accounting for and compensating for inherent parasitic capacitance due to packaging, printed-circuit-board (PCB) routing, or electrostatic-discharge (ESD) protection circuitry.

The apparatus associated with the method presented herein can also accommodate the testing of other on-chip components (such as capacitor banks) associated with other blocks present in the integrated circuit under test, via a component selection block consisting primarily of digitally-controlled switches. The apparatus can also accommodate (such as by means of digitally-controlled switches) the testing of different aspects associated with the same active blocks of the oscillator (e.g., a common-mode voltage or a differential voltage), by selectively connecting the testing circuitry to different nodes of interest in the circuit under test. In normal operation, the BIST circuit is disconnected from the main circuit and does not interfere with the oscillator core. Internal circuit implementations of the different blocks of the BIST apparatus, relevant to low-voltage integrated circuits, are also disclosed.

An advantage of the disclosed BIST method and apparatus is minimally-invasive and efficient testing of the main building blocks of an oscillator and their correct operation when simultaneously engaged, while ensuring the correct tuning of two-capacitor topologies in cases where one or both of the oscillator capacitors is affected by imprecise parasitics.

Accordingly, in accordance with certain representative embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided a BIST method for testing an integrated circuit oscillator circuit topology by evaluating bias voltages of the oscillator core of an oscillator of the integrated circuit in accordance with a reconfigurable test matrix of the integrated circuit. There is additionally provided a BIST apparatus that has: a reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix coupled to programmable oscillator capacitors of an oscillator of the integrated circuit and an oscillator core of the oscillator; a reconfigurable test matrix of the integrated circuit coupled to the oscillator core of the oscillator and a test element of the integrated circuit coupled to the reconfigurable test matrix, where the bias voltages of the oscillator core are evaluated by the test element in accordance with the reconfigurable test matrix; and a control element coupled to and operable to control the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix and the reconfigurable test matrix.

While this disclosure is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detail specific embodiments, with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an example of the principles of the invention and not intended to limit the disclosure to the specific embodiments shown and described. In the description below, like reference numerals are used to describe the same, similar or corresponding parts in the several views of the drawings.

In this document, relational terms such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element preceded by “comprises . . . a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises the element.

Reference throughout this document to “one embodiment”, “certain embodiments”, “an embodiment” or similar terms means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present disclosure. Thus, the appearances of such phrases or in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments without limitation.

The term “or” as used herein is to be interpreted as an inclusive or meaning any one or any combination. Therefore, “A, B or C” means “any of the following: A; B; C; A and B; A and C; B and C; A, B and C”. An exception to this definition will occur only when a combination of elements, functions, steps or acts are in some way inherently mutually exclusive.

For simplicity and clarity of illustration, reference numerals may be repeated among the figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements. Numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the embodiments described herein. The embodiments may be practiced without these details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, and components have not been described in detail to avoid obscuring the embodiments described. The description is not to be considered as limited to the scope of the embodiments described herein.

Referring now to FIG. 1, an embodiment of a BIST architecture for a generic crystal oscillator circuit under test using reconfigurable connection matrices and a dedicated relaxation oscillator is shown. The block diagram 100 illustrates BIST architecture comprising an oscillator core (crystal (XTAL) oscillator core 110) and capacitors (XTAL oscillator capacitors 120). Using a digitally-controlled reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix 130, the programmable crystal oscillator capacitors 120 are connected to a relaxation oscillator 140 that generates a signal at a frequency different from the frequency of the crystal oscillator determined by the crystal resonator XTAL 115. The frequency of the oscillator resonator is much higher than the signal generated by the relaxation oscillator and the frequency of the resonator used can vary widely; the crystal resonator can be anything approximately 10 MHz to approximately 50 MHz. For example, if the frequency of the XTAL oscillator resonator 115 is 32 MHz, the frequency of the relaxation oscillator 140 can be on the order of 1 MHz. The correct operation and functionality of each of the oscillator capacitors 120 (shown as C1, C2 in FIGS. 2-7) is tested by recording the frequency of the relaxation oscillator as a function of a programming code applied to the programmable oscillator capacitors 120, known as a capacitance programming code, capacitance code, capacitor code, digital capacitor code or the like. During this test, the crystal oscillator core 110 is put in high-impedance (high-Z) mode to eliminate any interference from other circuit components. Capacitors external to the crystal oscillator under test (e.g., associated with another on-chip crystal oscillator, such as those found in FIGS. 6, 7, and 9, for example) can also be tested in this way, simply by connecting them to the same relaxation oscillator 140 via the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix 130 and repeating the above procedure. Such capacitors external to and distinct from the programmable oscillator capacitors 120 associated with the oscillator under test may be denoted herein as Cext, Ctest, a second plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors (as opposed to a first plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors 120 that together with the oscillator core 110 and resonator 115 make up with an oscillator under test), or the like.

Further, using a digitally-controlled reconfigurable DC test matrix 150, the DC bias voltages associated with the crystal oscillator core 110 (the active portion of the oscillator circuit) are evaluated for correctness in a DC test block 160, which provides a measure of health for the active portion of the oscillator. During the DC test, some or all of the oscillator capacitors 120 are set to their maximum values via the control element 170, shown here as digital control 170 though the control is not required to be digital control, for inhibiting the generation of any oscillations that would otherwise occur. As will be described, this includes setting some or all of the capacitors of the oscillator capacitor banks, such as the van den Homberg oscillator capacitor banks C1, C2 shown in FIG. 2, to their maximum value and also may preferably include setting to their maximum value some or all of the external capacitors 180 of the IC not affiliated with the programmable oscillator capacitors 120. So long as the loop gain is less than 1, oscillation of the crystal oscillator 115 is inhibited. Further, as previously mentioned, the digital control for the required reconfiguration and testing functions can be integrated with the main digital section of the system or it may be provided more locally.

FIG. 2 shows an example diagram 200 of a single-pin crystal oscillator under test that employs van den Homberg architecture using two transconductors 210, 220 as active elements of oscillator core 110. FIG. 3 shows an alternative representation 300 of the oscillator in FIG. 2, using an operational transconductance amplifier (OTA) 310 as an active element of oscillator core 110. Both of these architectures in FIGS. 2 and 3 employ programmable oscillator capacitors C₁, C₂ of the type shown in diagram 400 of FIG. 4. FIG. 5 shows a circuit 500 that illustrates a control scheme for putting the active core of the oscillator in FIG. 3 (OTA 310 including the bias resistance R_(bias) on the crystal side) in high-Z mode, thereby allowing for testing of programmable oscillator capacitors C₁, C₂ as described for FIG. 1.

FIGS. 6 and 7 illustrate examples of the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix 130 in FIG. 1, which operates in conjunction with the high-Z mode of the crystal oscillator core 110. Programmable oscillator capacitors C₁ 610 and C₂ 615 of block diagram 600 are of the type shown in FIG. 4, and may play the role of C₁, C₂, respectively, in FIG. 2 or 3. Programmable oscillator capacitors Cext1 620 and Cext2 625 are also of the type shown in FIG. 4, but are not associated with the oscillator under test comprised of oscillator core 110 and oscillator capacitors 120; instead, they may be external capacitors C₁, C₂, respectively, of a different oscillator present on the same chip (IC), such as the simple CMOS-inverter crystal oscillator 800 shown in FIG. 8, possibly operating at orders of magnitude different relative to the oscillator under test, such as, for example, 32 KHz relative to 32 MHz.

Diagram 600 of FIG. 6 illustrates a detailed example implementation of the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix, operating in conjunction with the high-Z mode of the crystal oscillator core, for capacitor testing using the relaxation oscillator in FIG. 1. In FIG. 6, oscillator capacitors C₁ 610, C₂ 615 are in turn connected to a relaxation oscillator 140 via switches sw_(c1) 630 and sw_(c2) 635, respectively, which each serve, when connected, as the only capacitance associated with the relaxation oscillator 140. External capacitors Cext1 620 and Cext1 625 are connected to the relaxation oscillator 140 via switches sw_(cx1) 640 and sw_(cx2) 645, respectively. Switches sw_(c1) 630, sw_(c2) 635, sw_(cx1) 640, sw_(cx2) 645 are controlled by non-overlapping digital control signals SEL_(C1) 650, SEL_(C1) 655, SEL_(CX1) 660, and SEL_(CX2) 665, respectively, provided by digital control 170.

Referring now to the diagram of FIG. 7, a detailed implementation of the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix is shown. In this example, the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix operates in conjunction with the high-Z mode of the crystal oscillator core, for capacitor testing using the relaxation oscillator in FIG. 1, with the possibility of connecting additional capacitors in parallel with the original capacitors of the oscillator for inhibiting the oscillation under DC test. In the block diagram 700, external capacitors Cext1 620 and Cext2 625 can be connected in parallel with capacitors C₁ 610, C₂ 615, respectively, via switches sw_(cext1) 710, sw_(cext2) 715, which are controlled by digital control signals SELCEXT1, SELCEXT2 as shown, for the purpose of inhibiting the oscillation of XTAL 115 during DC test. Further, the high-Z functionality used to test functionality of programmable oscillator capacitors may be implemented using switches sw_(R1) 670 and sw_(R2) 675, which disconnect the resistive divider R₁, R₂ 680 from the supply and ground nodes, operating in conjunction with a high-Z control scheme such as illustrated in FIG. 5 for the crystal oscillator core 110. A parasitic capacitance C_(p) 685, which may be associated with the crystal package, chip package, ESD protection circuits, or printed circuit board, is shown in parallel with the crystal XTAL 115.

An example implementation of the relaxation oscillator 140 in FIG. 1, 6, or 7 is shown in block diagram 900 of FIG. 9. The resistor arrangement permits the comparator COMP to operate with input voltage ranges that do not include the V_(DD/2) point, which is advantageous in low-voltage systems in that the internal structure of the comparator 910 can be topologically simple and ensure operation of transistors away from the triode region (in CMOS implementations). C_(test) capacitor 920 is a digitally-programmable test capacitor, as illustrated in FIG. 4, for example. It will be recognized, however, that the functionality of C_(test) can be provided by C₁ 610, C₂ 615, C_(ext1) 620 or C_(ext2) 625, as previously discussed. The output Vout is received by digital control block 170. An example CMOS implementation 1000 of comparator COMP of FIG. 9 is shown in FIG. 10. Consider the following example in which I₁=I₂ and V_(DD/2)=0.9 V in FIG. 9, R₁=200KΩ, R₂=33.3KΩ, and R₃=100KΩ, then the input voltage range for comparator COMP 910 is about [100 mV, 300 mV], as shown in voltage waveform 1100 of FIG. 11, sufficient for maintaining in saturation all MOS transistors in FIG. 10 (including tail bias transistor M₉).

FIG. 12 illustrates an example plot 1200 of the oscillation frequency of relaxation oscillator 900 shown in FIG. 9, using a digitally-programmable test capacitor C_(test) 920 as may be provided by FIG. 4, as a function of the capacitance code. The smoothness and monotonicity of this plot are indicators of the correct performance of the capacitor banks C₁, C₂ associated with the crystal oscillator under test. Because the relaxation oscillator of FIG. 9 is used in the BIST system of FIG. 6 or 7, it is understood that the role of C_(test) 920 in FIG. 9 can be taken by either C₁, C₂, C_(ext1), or C_(ext2) in FIGS. 6, 7, as has been previously described.

In addition to the stand-alone evaluation of the capacitor banks, recording the output frequency of the relaxation oscillator under different scenarios permits the calibration of C₁, C₂ in FIGS. 6, 7 for correct oscillator operation. This calibration may be performed using the following example methodology:

-   -   1. Select C₁ 610 for the relaxation oscillator 140 by closing         sw_(c1) 630 and opening all other switches 635, 640, 645, 670,         675.     -   2. Set the capacitor code for C₁ 610 to zero. Referring to FIG.         4, set b_(M-1)=b_(M-2)= . . . =b₁=b₀=0; in this way, only C_(p)         685 and the minimum parasitics associated with C₁ 610 appear in         the circuit 600.     -   3. Measure the frequency of the relaxation oscillator f_(ROref)         using the minimal capacitor code value for C₁. This measurement         can be performed by digital control block 170.     -   4. Next, select C₂ 615 for the relaxation oscillator by closing         sw_(c2) 635 and opening all other switches 630, 640, 645, 670,         675.     -   5. Sweep the digital capacitor code (Δ_(code)), the decimal         equivalent of b_(M-1) . . . b₁b₀ for C₂ 615 from zero to the         maximum value, and measure the frequency of the relaxation         oscillator 140 at points during the sweep, up to every point.     -   6. Pick the digital capacitor code (Δ_(code)) where the         frequency of the relaxation oscillator 140 is approximately         equal to f_(ROref). It may be desirable to dial back the digital         capacitor code by a small value—such as 1 or 2—to provide margin         over process, voltage, and temperature parameters.     -   7. This decimal code (Δ_(code)) is the code that makes C₂         approximately equal to C_(P) plus the minimum parasitics of C₁         on the crystal side. It is also the code offset that should         preferably be maintained between the decimal capacitor codes         C_(1code) and C_(2code), C_(1code) and C_(2code) correspond to         C₁ and C₂, respectively, for correct oscillator operation when         C₁ is adjusted for frequency tuning (i.e., the relationship         C_(2code)=C_(1code)+Δ_(code) is preferably maintained).

Alternatively, the binary equivalent of Δ_(code) above can be found using a binary search methodology, such as the example binary search flow 1300 shown in FIG. 13. The capacitance code corresponding to frequency f_(ROref) in FIG. 12 can be found using a digitally-programmable test capacitor C_(test) such as that described in connection with FIG. 4. This approach has the advantage of a potentially much reduced test time required to find the binary equivalent of Δ_(code) compared to the above methodology. At block 1310 k=M−1 and at block 1320 b_(K)=1. The inquiry at decision block 1330 is whether f_(RO)<f_(ROref). If yes, then b_(K)=0 at block 1340; if no, then b_(K) remains unchanged: b_(K)=1. At block 1350, k=k−1 and the flow continues to decision block 1360. If k>=0 then the flow returns to block 1320. From this example flow, it can be seen that a binary search methodology for finding the capacitance code corresponding to frequency f_(ROref) in FIG. 12 is provided.

Turning again to the testing of active components of XTAL oscillator core 110, block diagram 1400 of FIG. 14 shows a detailed example implementation of the reconfigurable DC test matrix and the DC test block in FIG. 1, 6, or 7. Some or all of the capacitors associated with the oscillator assume their maximum values in order to inhibit and hopefully prevent oscillations from initiating in the oscillator during the DC test. Preferably all capacitors, even external capacitors C_(ext1) and C_(ext2) shown explicitly in FIGS. 6, 7 may also be connected if available, so as to prevent oscillations from initiating in the oscillator during the DC test. Digital control signal DCTEST=1 selects the common-mode test; DCTEST=0 selects the differential-mode test. For DCTEST=1, the DC voltage of node A of the oscillator shown in FIG. 2, 3, 5, 6, or 7 is compared against the limits V_(REFCM+) and V_(REFCM1). If the voltage is between V_(REFCM+) and V_(REFCM−), the outputs of comparators COMP_(DC1) and COMP_(DC2) are high, indicating correct operation. Similarly, for DCTEST=0, the DC voltage of node B of the oscillator shown in FIG. 2, 3, 5, 6, or 7 is compared against the limits V_(REFDM+) and V_(REFDM−), where V_(REFDM+) and V_(REFDM−) are now pegged to the voltage V_(A) of node A, for example V_(REFDM+)=V_(A)+ΔV_(DM), V_(REFDM−)=V_(A)−ΔV_(DM), and ΔV_(DM) is consistent with the relatively small offset values appearing in the normal operation of a differential transconductor or OTA. If the voltage is between V_(REFDM+) and V_(REFDM−), the outputs of comparators COMP_(DC1) and COMP_(DC2) are high, indicating correct operation.

In view of the foregoing, a built-in self-test (BIST) methodology and the associated test hardware for low-voltage crystal oscillators, such as single-pin crystal oscillators, are disclosed. An example oscillator configuration covered by the method and disclosed herein is the van den Homberg architecture, but other configurations, such as that illustrated in FIG. 8, for example, can also be tested and/or calibrated. The methodology presented herein therefore covers the separate evaluation of the essential building blocks of the oscillator, such as passive capacitor banks and active transconductors, and also provides a calibration approach for ensuring oscillation at the correct frequency with minimum start-up time over the desired tuning range (i.e., for all possible values of the crystal load capacitance), regardless of the capacitive parasitics affecting the integrated circuit (due to the crystal package, chip package, ESD protection circuits, or printed circuit board). For capacitor testing and calibration, the method relies on using the capacitor banks of the oscillator under test in a separate on-chip relaxation oscillator operating at different frequencies compared to the main crystal oscillator, using digitally-controlled reconfigurable matrices and dedicated circuitry for the relaxation oscillator, while the active oscillator core is in a high-impedance mode. The BIST system can also test other on-chip capacitors not normally associated with the single-pin crystal oscillator under test, by additional connections established in the reconfigurable matrices. The evaluation of the health of the oscillator active core (comprising, for example, transconductors) is done indirectly by maintaining the core in the normal mode while setting capacitors to their maximum value, which inhibits any oscillation from initiating, and monitoring the appropriate bias (DC) voltages in the core for correct values. Relevant circuit implementations used in the BIST system are also disclosed.

Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present disclosure has been described in terms of example embodiments based upon use of a programmed processor. However, the invention should not be so limited, since the present disclosure could be implemented using hardware component equivalents such as special purpose hardware and/or dedicated processors which are equivalents to the disclosure as described and claimed. Similarly, general purpose computers, microprocessor based computers, micro-controllers, optical computers, analog computers, dedicated processors and/or dedicated hard wired logic may be used to construct alternative equivalent embodiments of the present disclosure.

Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that a program flow and associated data used to implement the embodiments described above can be implemented using various forms of storage such as Read Only Memory (ROM), Random Access Memory (RAM), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EEPROM); non-volatile memory (NVM); mass storage such as a hard disc drive, floppy disc drive, optical disc drive; optical storage elements, magnetic storage elements, magneto-optical storage elements, flash memory, core memory and/or other equivalent storage technologies without departing from the present disclosure. Such alternative storage devices should be considered equivalents.

Various embodiments described herein are implemented using programmed processors executing programming instructions that are broadly described in flow chart form that can be stored on any suitable electronic storage medium or transmitted over any suitable electronic communication medium. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the processes described above can be implemented in any number of variations and in many suitable programming languages without departing from the present disclosure. For example, the order of certain operations carried out can often be varied, additional operations can be added or operations can be deleted without departing from the disclosure. Error trapping can be added and/or enhanced and variations can be made in user interface and information presentation without departing from the present disclosure. Such variations are contemplated and considered equivalent.

The representative embodiments, which have been described in detail herein, have been presented by way of example and not by way of limitation. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made in the form and details of the described embodiments resulting in equivalent embodiments that remain within the scope of the appended claims.

Accordingly, some aspects and features of the disclosed embodiments are set out in the following numbered items:

1. A built-in self-test (BIST) apparatus of an integrated circuit, comprising: a reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix coupled to one or more of a plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors of an oscillator of the integrated circuit and an oscillator core of the oscillator; a reconfigurable test matrix of the integrated circuit coupled to the oscillator core of the oscillator and a test element of the integrated circuit coupled to the reconfigurable test matrix, where the bias voltages of the oscillator core are evaluated by the test element in accordance with the reconfigurable test matrix; and a control element coupled to and operable to control the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix and the reconfigurable test matrix.

2. The apparatus of item 1, where the reconfigurable test matrix is a reconfigurable direct current (DC) text matrix and the test element is a DC test element and where the DC bias voltages of the oscillator core are evaluated by the DC test element in accordance with the reconfigurable DC text matrix.

3. The apparatus of item 1, where before the bias voltages of the oscillator core are evaluated by the test element in accordance with the reconfigurable test matrix the control element controls one or more of the plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors to inhibit oscillation of a resonator of the oscillator.

4. The apparatus of item 3, where the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix comprises a plurality of switching elements coupled to the plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors and where the control element controls the plurality of switching elements to selectively control the one or more programmable oscillator capacitors to inhibit oscillation of the resonator of the oscillator.

5. The apparatus of item 1, where the control element sets the one or more programmable oscillator capacitors to maximum values.

6. The apparatus of item 5, where the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix comprises a plurality of switching elements that under control by the control element selects the one or more programmable oscillator capacitors.

7. The apparatus of item 5, further where the control element sets one or more of a second plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors of a second oscillator of the integrated circuit to maximum values.

8. The apparatus of item 7, where the control element controls the plurality of switching elements of the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix to select the one or more programmable oscillator capacitors of the second plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors.

9. The apparatus of item 1, where the oscillator is a van den Homberg oscillator that comprises a single-pin resonator.

10. The apparatus of item 1, where the control element is a digital control element.

11. A built-in self-test (BIST) method for testing an integrated circuit oscillator circuit topology, comprising: evaluating bias voltages of the oscillator core of an oscillator of the integrated circuit in accordance with a reconfigurable test matrix of the integrated circuit.

12. The method of item 11, where a test element of the integrated circuit coupled to the reconfigurable test matrix evaluates the bias voltages of the oscillator core in accordance with the reconfigurable test matrix.

13. The method of item 11, further comprising inhibiting oscillation of a resonator of the oscillator before evaluating bias voltages of the oscillator core.

14. The method of item 13, selectively controlling one or more programmable oscillator capacitors of the oscillator of the integrated circuit to inhibit oscillation of the resonator.

15. The method of item 14, where selectively controlling the one or more programmable oscillator capacitors further comprises selectively controlling a plurality of switching elements of a reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix coupled to the oscillator core of the oscillator.

16. The method of item 14, further comprising setting one or more of the plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors to maximum values to inhibit oscillation of the resonator of the oscillator before evaluating bias voltages of the oscillator core.

17. The method of item 16, further comprising during a DC test:

setting the one or more of the plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors to maximum values by a control element; and

evaluating bias voltages of the oscillator core by a test element in accordance with a reconfigurable test matrix coupled to the oscillator core of the oscillator.

18. The method of item 17, further comprising selecting by a reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix under control of the control element the one or more of the plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors to be set to maximum values.

19. The method of item 14, further comprising selecting the one or more of the plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors to be set to maximum values.

20. The method of item 14, further comprising setting one or more a second plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors of a second oscillator of the integrated circuit to maximum values to further inhibit oscillation of the resonator of the oscillator before evaluating bias voltages of the oscillator core of the oscillator.

21. The method of item 20, further comprising selecting the one or more of the second plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors to be set to maximum values. 

The invention claimed is:
 1. A built-in self-test (BIST) apparatus of an integrated circuit, comprising: a reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix coupled to one or more of a plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors of an oscillator of the integrated circuit and an oscillator core of the oscillator; a reconfigurable test matrix of the integrated circuit coupled to the oscillator core of the oscillator and a test element of the integrated circuit coupled to the reconfigurable test matrix, where the bias voltages of the oscillator core are evaluated by the test element in accordance with the reconfigurable test matrix; and a control element coupled to and operable to control the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix and the reconfigurable test matrix, the control element further operable to control one or more of the plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors to inhibit oscillation of a resonator of the oscillator before the bias voltages of the oscillator core are evaluated by the test element in accordance with the reconfigurable test matrix.
 2. The apparatus of claim 1, where the reconfigurable test matrix is a reconfigurable direct current (DC) test matrix and the test element is a DC test element and where the DC bias voltages of the oscillator core are evaluated by the DC test element in accordance with the reconfigurable DC test matrix.
 3. The apparatus of claim 1, where the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix comprises a plurality of switching elements coupled to the plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors and where the control element controls the plurality of switching elements to selectively control the one or more programmable oscillator capacitors to inhibit oscillation of the resonator of the oscillator.
 4. The apparatus of claim 1, where the control element sets the one or more programmable oscillator capacitors to maximum values.
 5. The apparatus of claim 4, where the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix comprises a plurality of switching elements that under control by the control element selects the one or more programmable oscillator capacitors.
 6. The apparatus of claim 4, further where the control element sets one or more of a second plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors of a second oscillator of the integrated circuit to maximum values.
 7. The apparatus of claim 6, where the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix includes a plurality of switching elements and the control element controls the plurality of switching elements of the reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix to select the one or more programmable oscillator capacitors of the second plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors.
 8. The apparatus of claim 1, where the oscillator is a van den Homberg oscillator that comprises a single-pin resonator.
 9. The apparatus of claim 1, where the control element is a digital control element.
 10. A built-in self-test (BIST) method for testing an integrated circuit oscillator circuit topology, comprising: inhibiting oscillation of a resonator of an oscillator of the integrated circuit; evaluating bias voltages of the oscillator core of the oscillator of the integrated circuit in accordance with a reconfigurable test matrix of the integrated circuit after the inhibiting the oscillation of the resonator of the oscillator.
 11. The method of claim 10, where a test element of the integrated circuit coupled to the reconfigurable test matrix evaluates the bias voltages of the oscillator core in accordance with the reconfigurable test matrix.
 12. The method of claim 10, selectively controlling one or more programmable oscillator capacitors of the oscillator of the integrated circuit to inhibit oscillation of the resonator.
 13. The method of claim 12, where selectively controlling the one or more programmable oscillator capacitors further comprises selectively controlling a plurality of switching elements of a reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix coupled to the oscillator core of the oscillator.
 14. The method of claim 12, further comprising setting one or more of the plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors to maximum values to inhibit oscillation of the resonator of the oscillator before evaluating bias voltages of the oscillator core.
 15. The method of claim 14, further comprising during a DC test: setting the one or more of the plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors to maximum values by a control element; and evaluating bias voltages of the oscillator core by a test element in accordance with a reconfigurable test matrix coupled to the oscillator core of the oscillator.
 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising selecting by a reconfigurable capacitor connection matrix under control of the control element the one or more of the plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors to be set to maximum values.
 17. The method of claim 12, further comprising selecting the one or more of the plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors to be set to maximum values.
 18. The method of claim 12, further comprising setting one or more a second plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors of a second oscillator of the integrated circuit to maximum values to further inhibit oscillation of the resonator of the oscillator before evaluating bias voltages of the oscillator core of the oscillator.
 19. The method of claim 18, further comprising selecting the one or more of the second plurality of programmable oscillator capacitors to be set to maximum values. 